Ho Ching Wu vs Ikumi Yamazaki Head-to-Head Stats, Results & Performance Comparison
Wojtek Kolan
HEAD TO HEAD
H. Ching Wu vs I. Yamazaki

Ho Ching Wu
HKG
w
l
l
w
w
l
w
l
l
l
0
Win
1
Played
1
Win
34
Age
24
-
Height
-
851
C. Rank
376
536
Best Rank
348
0
Total Titles
0
0
YTD Titles
0
$1.0K
Career Money
$0
-
Plays
-

Ikumi Yamazaki
JPN
w
w
l
w
l
w
l
l
l
l
0
Win
1
Played
1
Win
34
Age
24
-
Height
-
851
C. Rank
376
536
Best Rank
348
0
Total Titles
0
0
YTD Titles
0
$1.0K
Career Money
$0
-
Plays
-
Head-to-head: Wu 0 - 1 Yamazaki
They have played 3 sets in total, with Ho Ching Wu winning 1 and Ikumi Yamazaki winning 2. The last match between Ikumi Yamazaki and Ho Ching Wu was at the W15 Fukui, 24-05-2024, Round: QF, Surface: Hard, with Ikumi Yamazaki getting the victory 4-6 6-4 6-2.
| Players | Head To Head Match Wins |
|---|---|
| Wu | 0 |
| Yamazaki | 1 |
Last 1 H2H Matches:
(QF) W15 Fukui(05-24-24)
Ikumi Yamazaki
4
6
6
Ho Ching Wu
6
4
2
H. C. Wu vs I. Yamazaki H2H Profile
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| $1,005 | Career Prize Money | $0 |
| 49.54% (271-276) | Career Total W/L | 60.65% (131-85) |
| 0 | Hard | 1 |
| 4 | Titles | 3 |
| 0 | Total H2H Matches | 1 |
| 25.00% (1-3) | YTD Win/Loss | 0% (0-0) |
H. C. Wu vs I. Yamazaki Match Preview:
- Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Ho Ching Wu has won 36.84% of points on their second serve, while Ikumi Yamazaki has won 40.71%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
- Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Ho Ching Wu, in recent form, has won 50.00% of their opponent's second serve points, while Ikumi Yamazaki has won 48.46%. The same stats for first serve returns are 33.33% and 35.29% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
- Under pressure analysis: Ho Ching Wu has saved 23.53% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Ikumi Yamazaki has saved 47.88% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
- Performance overview: Over the last year Ho Ching Wu has won 45.83% of matches played (W/L 11/13), with Ikumi Yamazaki winning 56.14% (W/L 32/25) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
- Best surface: Ho Ching Wu has their best career surface win % on I.hard, winning 60% (W/L 15/10), and worse career win % on Hard, winning 49% (W/L 254/264). Ikumi Yamazaki has their best career surface win % on Grass, winning 60% (W/L 7/0), and worse career win % on I.hard, winning 50% (W/L 6/6).
- Player level: In the last year, Ho Ching Wu has played most of their matches on the Futures/Satellites/ITF tournaments $10K, winning 53.85% of matches (W/L 7/6), where as Ikumi Yamazaki has played most of their matches on the Challengers/ITF tournaments > $10K, winning 52.94% of matches (W/L 27/24). When comparing stats between players to predict the favorite, it is of course all relative to the event level they have been playing at.
- Direct H2H matches: They have played 1 times before with Ho Ching Wu winning 0 times and Ikumi Yamazaki being victorious 1 times. They have played 3 sets in total, with Ho Ching Wu winning 1 and Ikumi Yamazaki winning 2.
- The last match between Ho Ching Wu and Ikumi Yamazaki was at the W15 Fukui, 24-05-2024, Round: QF, Surface: Hard, with Ikumi Yamazaki getting the victory 4-6 6-4 6-2.
- Head to head match duration: In past head to head matches, the average match time between these players has been 2:25:0.
- Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Ho Ching Wu has played against opponents with an average rank of 494.38 while Ikumi Yamazaki has played against players with an average rank of 447.16.
- Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Ho Ching Wu has won 71% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Ikumi Yamazaki has won 63% in all matches played on tour.
- Break point conversion: In recent form, Ho Ching Wu has converted 30.77% of breakpoint opportunities, and Ikumi Yamazaki has converted 42.65% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.
Ho Ching Wu vs Ikumi Yamazaki Editorial Preview By TennisTipster88.
H. C. Wu vs I. Yamazaki H2H Stats Used In Our Predictions
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 0 | H2H Matches Won | 1 |
| 1 | Sets Won | 2 |
| 12 | Games Won | 16 |
| 2 | Aces (Total) | 2 |
| 7 | Total Double Faults | 1 |
| 2:25:0 | Average Match Time | 2:25:0 |
| 60% (56/94) | 1st Serve % | 77% (58/75) |
| 50% (28/56) | 1st Serve Win % | 57% (33/58) |
| 45% (17/38) | 2nd Serve Win % | 47% (8/17) |
| 100% (6/6) | Break Pts Won % | 53% (8/15) |
| 45% (34/75) | Return Points Win % | 52% (49/94) |
| 0% (0/1) | Best‑of‑3 Win % | 100% (1/1) |
| 0% (0/1) | Deciding Set Win % | 100% (1/1) |
| 0% (0/1) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 0% (0/0) |
| 100% (1/1) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 100% (1/1) |
Recent Performance Stats
2nd Serve Win %: Wu 40%, Yamazaki 43%.
Opp 2nd Serve Pts Won: Wu 56%, Yamazaki 56%.
Break Points Saved %: Wu 49%, Yamazaki 51%.
H. C. Wu Recent Matches Played
| OPPONENT | RESULT | SCORE | H2H | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
R1 | L | 4-6 6-1 6-1 | ||
R1 | L | 6-1 6-0 | ||
R2 | L | 6-3 6-3 | ||
R1 | W | 4-6 7-5 6-0 | ||
QF | L | 6-0 ret. | ||
I. Yamazaki Recent Matches Played
| OPPONENT | RESULT | SCORE | H2H | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
R1 | L | 6-4 6-3 | ||
Q1 | L | 6-2 6-3 | ||
R1 | L | 6-7(5) 6-3 6-0 | ||
R2 | L | 7-6(6) 6-3 | ||
R1 | W | 6-1 6-3 | ||

H. C. Wu vs I. Yamazaki Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 49.54% (271/276) | YTD Win/Loss | 60.65% (131/85) |
| 49.96% (604/605) | Sets Win/Loss | 58.33% (287/205) |
| 50.51% (5306/5199) | Games Win/Loss | 53.20% (2367/2082) |
| 49.03% (254/264) | Hard Win/Loss | 54.81% (57/47) |
| 50.00% (2/2) | Clay Win/Loss | 67.53% (52/25) |
| 60.00% (15/10) | Indoor Hard W/L | 53.57% (15/13) |
| 0% (0/0) | Grass Win/Loss | 100.00% (7/0) |
| 0.07 | Aces Per Game | 0.07 |
| 354 | Aces Total | 150 |
| 0.27 | Double Faults Per Game | 0.27 |
| 1380 | Total Double Faults | 584 |
| 1st Match | Average Match Time | 1:29:15 |
| 508.96 | Average Opponent Rank | 426.37 |
| 65% (13625/21077) | 1st Serve % | 69% (8258/11975) |
| 60% (8209/13625) | 1st Serve Win % | 58% (4760/8258) |
| 42% (3109/7452) | 2nd Serve Win % | 44% (1624/3717) |
| 50% (1319/2624) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 50% (813/1633) |
| 47% (9646/20672) | Return Points Win % | 48% (5804/12131) |
| 11.11% (1/8) | Cups W/L | 0% (0/0) |
| 12.50% (1/7) | Main Tour W/L | 0.00% (0/1) |
| 43.09% (78/103) | Challenger W/L | 59.39% (98/67) |
| 54.73% (191/158) | Futures W/L | 66.00% (33/17) |
| 50% (267/537) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 60% (128/212) |
| 100% (1/1) | Best of 5 Sets Win % | 100% (2/2) |
| 43% (31/72) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 63% (20/32) |
| 47% (58/123) | Deciding Set Win % | 57% (35/61) |
| 86% (286/246) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 91% (119/108) |
| 14% (286/40) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 9% (119/11) |
| 9% (261/24) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 24% (96/23) |
Other Tennis Predictions Today
07:05 AM 16/11/25
Prediction02:00 AM 17/11/25
Prediction12:00 PM 16/11/25
Prediction12:00 PM 16/11/25
Prediction07:40 AM 16/11/25
Prediction01:30 PM 16/11/25
PredictionTennis Previews & Betting Tips
15 Nov 2025
Carlos Alcaraz vs Felix Auger Aliassime Prediction – ATP Nitto ATP Finals – 15th November 2025 Best Bets
15 Nov 2025
Rebecca Sramkova vs Simona Waltert Prediction – WTA Billie Jean King Cup, PO, Group C – 15th November 2025 Best Bets
15 Nov 2025
Maria Camila Osorio Serrano vs Antonia Ruzic Prediction – WTA Billie Jean King Cup, PO, Group D – 15th November 2025 Best Bets
15 Nov 2025
Prediction Of Auger-Aliassime Vs Minaur H2H, Who Will Win At ATP Nitto Atp Finals 2025?
15 Nov 2025
Prediction Of Alcaraz Vs Auger-Aliassime H2H, Who Will Win At ATP Nitto Atp Finals 2025?
15 Nov 2025
Prediction Of Sinner Vs Minaur H2H, Who Will Win At ATP Nitto Atp Finals 2025?
Top Predictions Today
H2H 5-10
H2H 0-0
07:05
H2H 0-1
12:30
H2H 0-0
Tennis Events This Week
Bergamo Challenger
Italy
Brisbane 3 Challenger
Australia
Champaign Challenger
United States
Drummondville Challenger
Canada
Kobe Challenger
Japan
Montemar Challenger
Spain
Montevideo Challenger
Uruguay
Soma Bay Challenger
Egypt
Sydney Challenger
Australia
Yokohama Challenger
Japan
M15 Alcala de Henares
Spain
M15 Antalya
Turkey
M15 Azul
Argentina
M15 Bhubaneswar
India
M15 Criciuma
Brazil
M15 Gimcheon
Korea, Rep.
M15 Heraklion
Greece
M15 Kuala Lumpur
Malaysia
M15 Las Palmas de Gran Canaria
Spain
M15 Luanda
Angola
M15 Monastir
Tunisia
M15 Orlando
United States
M15 San Gregorio di Catania
Italy
M15 Sharm ElSheikh
Egypt
M25 Antalya
Turkey
M25 Columbus
United States
M25 Heraklion
Greece
M25 Luanda
Angola
M25 Manama
Bahrain
M25 Monastir
Tunisia
M25 Vale do Lobo
Portugal